ISO 9001: 2015 - Internal Audit Checklist for Human Resource Process in Manufacturing
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Master ISO 9001 training and competence audits with this comprehensive tabular HR checklist. This guide provides practical audit questions covering employee competence requirements, training records, awareness programs, roles and responsibilities, work environment, and organizational knowledge management. Quick reference format for efficient HR and people management auditing aligned with ISO 9001:2015 requirements.
Verify that the organization has adequate trained and skilled personnel to perform all functions affecting product quality. Check that staffing levels are sufficient to meet operational needs.
CLAUSE
AUDIT QUESTION
WHAT TO LOOK FOR
7.1.2
Does the organization have enough trained and skilled employees to run the business?
Staffing plans documented, headcount vs. required capacity defined, skill mix assessed, competent people identified for critical roles, vacation/leave coverage planned
✅ Competence Requirements Definition (Clause 7.2)
Verify that competence requirements are clearly defined for each job role. Check that qualifications, experience, education, and skills are documented for each position.
CLAUSE
AUDIT QUESTION
WHAT TO LOOK FOR
7.2
Are competence requirements defined for each job role? (qualifications, experience, skills)
Job descriptions document required qualifications, experience levels defined (years in role), technical skills listed, soft skills identified, certification requirements specified
Competence Elements: Education + Experience + Training + Skills + Awareness = Competent Person
π Training Requirements and Delivery (Clause 7.2)
Verify that employees receive training on their job responsibilities, safety procedures, and quality requirements. Check that training is documented and covers both technical and quality skills.
CLAUSE
AUDIT QUESTION
WHAT TO LOOK FOR
7.2
Are employees trained on their job responsibilities and safety procedures?
Initial job training documented, on-the-job training programs, supervision during learning period, training on equipment operation, safety training conducted, competency verification before independent work
7.2
Are new employees assessed for competence before starting work?
Pre-employment assessment conducted, relevant experience verified, educational qualifications confirmed, technical skills tested if required, assessment documented before hire
⚠️ Red Flag: Untrained employees operating equipment or performing quality-critical tasks indicates serious competence gap.
π Training Records and Documentation (Clause 7.2)
Verify that comprehensive training records are maintained for all employees. Check that records include who trained, when training occurred, topics covered, and competency verification.
CLAUSE
AUDIT QUESTION
WHAT TO LOOK FOR
7.2
Can you show training records for employees? (who trained, when, on what topics)
Training records maintained for all employees, trainer/instructor name documented, training date recorded, topics covered listed, duration noted, employee signature present, competency assessment recorded
7.2
Is there a training matrix or competence matrix showing employee skills?
Competence/skills matrix created by department, equipment/process training tracked, competency levels shown (trained, independent, trainer), refresh training dates noted, matrix kept current
Audit Check: Select 5-10 random employees and verify training records exist, are complete, and competency dates are current.
π Competence Evaluation and Training Needs (Clause 7.2)
Verify that competence levels are periodically evaluated to identify training gaps. Check that training is provided to address deficiencies and maintain competency.
CLAUSE
AUDIT QUESTION
WHAT TO LOOK FOR
7.2
Are competence levels evaluated periodically to identify training needs?
Formal competence assessments conducted annually or semi-annually, skills gaps identified, performance reviews assess competency, training needs identified from assessment, refresher training planned
⚠️ Key Requirement: Competence doesn't last forever. Regular evaluation ensures skills stay current and relevant.
π‘ Employee Awareness and Understanding (Clause 7.3)
Verify that employees understand the quality policy, objectives, and their role in achieving quality. Check that awareness is created through communication and demonstrated through employee actions.
CLAUSE
AUDIT QUESTION
WHAT TO LOOK FOR
7.3
Do employees understand the quality policy and their role in achieving it?
Quality policy posted visibly, employee interviews demonstrate understanding, employees can explain how their role supports quality, policy translated if needed for non-English speakers
7.3
Are employees aware of quality objectives and their contribution to achieving them?
Objectives communicated to all staff, departmental targets displayed, employees can discuss objectives, team meetings review progress, individual contributions linked to objectives
Interview Technique: Ask random employees: "What is our quality policy?" and "How does your job affect quality?" Their answers demonstrate awareness level.
π New Employee Induction Training (Clause 7.3)
Verify that new employees receive comprehensive induction training covering quality, safety, procedures, and company culture. Check that induction is documented and assessed for effectiveness.
CLAUSE
AUDIT QUESTION
WHAT TO LOOK FOR
7.3
Are new employees given induction training covering quality, safety, and company procedures?
Induction program documented with checklist, quality policy covered, safety orientation completed, procedures walkthrough, organizational structure explained, tour of facility conducted, trainer assigned
⚠️ Critical: New employees without proper induction are at risk of quality errors and safety incidents from day one.
π Organizational Roles, Responsibilities and Authorities (Clause 5.3)
Verify that organizational structure is defined and documented. Check that roles, responsibilities, and authorities are clearly assigned and understood by all employees.
CLAUSE
AUDIT QUESTION
WHAT TO LOOK FOR
5.3
Are job descriptions or role definitions documented for all employees?
Job descriptions for all positions, role scope defined, responsibilities listed, reporting relationships documented, organizational chart maintained, job descriptions updated when roles change
5.3
Are quality responsibilities clearly defined in job descriptions?
Do employees know who their supervisor is and who to report to?
Reporting lines clear and visible, organizational chart available, supervisory relationships documented, communication channels defined, escalation path known
π’ Internal Communication (Clause 7.4)
Verify that company policies, procedures, and quality requirements are effectively communicated to all employees. Check that communication is timely and understood by the target audience.
CLAUSE
AUDIT QUESTION
WHAT TO LOOK FOR
7.4
Are company policies and procedures communicated to all employees?
Procedures available (printed/digital), communication methods defined, training on procedures conducted, updates communicated promptly, feedback mechanisms for questions, documentation of communications
Communication Effectiveness: One-way communication isn't enough. Verify employees understand through interviews and observed compliance.
π Work Environment and Infrastructure (Clause 7.1.4)
Verify that the work environment is safe, clean, and conducive to quality work. Check that lighting, temperature, noise levels, and ergonomic principles are considered in workstation design.
CLAUSE
AUDIT QUESTION
WHAT TO LOOK FOR
7.1.4
Is the work environment safe and conducive to quality work? (lighting, temperature, cleanliness, noise)
Adequate lighting at workstations, temperature controls (comfortable range), work areas clean and organized, noise levels acceptable, ventilation adequate, general housekeeping excellent
7.1.4
Are ergonomic principles considered in workstation design?
Workstations designed to reduce strain, chairs adjustable, desks appropriate height, equipment positioned for easy access, repetitive motion minimized, safety principles incorporated
⚠️ Quality Impact: Poor work environment (noise, poor lighting, uncomfortable temperature) reduces focus and increases defects.
π§ Organizational Knowledge and Mentoring (Clause 7.1.6)
Verify that organizational knowledge is preserved and transferred. Check that experienced employees mentor newer staff and knowledge doesn't leave when experienced people depart.
CLAUSE
AUDIT QUESTION
WHAT TO LOOK FOR
7.1.6
Are experienced employees mentoring or coaching newer employees?
Mentorship programs formally established, experienced staff assigned as coaches, knowledge transfer structured, on-the-job training by experienced people, documentation of lessons learned
7.1.6
When experienced employees leave, is their knowledge transferred?
Exit knowledge transfer documented, replacement trained by departing person, procedures updated with departing employee's expertise, critical knowledge captured, continuity ensured
Knowledge Loss Risk: If critical knowledge exists only in one person's head, the organization is at risk of losing it.
πΌ Employee Retention and Contingency Planning (Clause 6.1)
Verify that contingency plans exist for key personnel changes. Check that career development and retention strategies are in place to maintain workforce stability.
CLAUSE
AUDIT QUESTION
WHAT TO LOOK FOR
6.1
Are contingency plans in place if key employees leave?
Critical person analysis conducted, succession plans documented, cross-training of backups, knowledge documentation, transition plans for key roles, risk assessment of key person dependencies
6.1
Are career development opportunities offered to retain good employees?
Career paths defined, training for advancement available, professional development funded, internal promotion considered, performance recognition programs, competitive compensation
⚠️ Business Continuity: Loss of key personnel without succession plans can cripple operations and quality.
π HR and Competence Audit Best Practices
Before the Audit
π Analyze Staffing Data
Review turnover rates, training completion trends, competence gaps identified in performance reviews
π Review Training Records
Sample historical training records to understand documentation quality and completeness
π₯ Prepare Interview List
Identify employees to interview across departments, job levels, and experience levels
π️ Request HR Documentation
Job descriptions, training records, competence matrices, organizational charts
During the Audit
π€ Interview Employees
Ask about training, quality policy, job responsibilities, awareness of objectives
π Review Training Records
Verify 10-15 employee files for training documentation, competency assessments, completeness
π Check Competence Matrix
Compare matrix against actual employee training records; verify currency and accuracy
π Observe Work Environment
Assess lighting, cleanliness, organization, temperature, noise, ergonomics at workstations
π Review Job Descriptions
Verify job descriptions exist for all key roles, include quality responsibilities
π Assess Induction
Review induction records for new hires; verify completeness and quality
After the Audit
π Comprehensive Report
Document competence levels, training effectiveness, awareness, HR system maturity
⭐ Rate HR System
Overall assessment of training and competence management effectiveness
π― Provide Recommendations
Suggest improvements for training programs, knowledge management, succession planning
✅ Require Actions
For nonconformities, require corrective actions with specific targets and timelines
π Follow-Up
Verify training completion and competence improvements in next audit
Employees working but no documented training or competence assessment records
Incomplete Job Descriptions
Job descriptions exist but lack competence requirements or quality responsibilities
Expired Competence
Training records outdated; no refresher training conducted despite time elapsed
No Competence Matrix
No visibility into who is trained on what; gaps in knowledge unknown
Poor Awareness
Employee interviews show weak understanding of quality policy and objectives
No Induction Program
New employees hired without formal orientation or quality training
Single-Point Dependency
Critical skills held by one person with no backup or knowledge transfer plan
Untrained Supervisors
Supervisors/team leads lack training on quality requirements or leadership skills
Poor Work Environment
Dirty workstations, poor lighting, noise, or temperature affects quality work
No Career Development
No training opportunities for advancement; high turnover of good employees
✨ Conclusion
This comprehensive ISO 9001 training and competence audit checklist in tabular format covers all critical HR and people management aspects from competence definition through knowledge management and employee retention. Effective HR audits verify that employees are adequately trained, aware of quality expectations, and empowered with the skills and knowledge to perform their roles effectively. Strong people management directly translates to consistent product quality and operational excellence.
Remember: Your quality system is only as good as the people who run it. Investing in competence, awareness, and knowledge management is essential for sustainable manufacturing excellence and continuous improvement.
π Explore Related Audit Guides
This blog is part of a comprehensive ISO 9001 internal audit series:
In quality management and audit practices, methodology isn’t just procedural—it’s foundational to credibility. Today, I want to clarify an important distinction that often gets overlooked: the difference between fact-finding and fault-finding audits. What is a Fact-Finding Audit? A fact-finding audit is an objective, predetermined approach to quality auditing. Here’s how it works in practice: The auditor decides in advance what they will check. For example, they might say, “I will audit the production area today and examine 3 production samples.” This sample size is predetermined, justified, and planned. During the audit, they check those 3 samples against established criteria. Then, critically, they report what they found—honestly. If there are zero non-conformities, they report zero. If there are non-conformities, they report those. The audit reflects reality. What is a Fault-Finding Audit? A fault-finding audit has a different mindset. The implicit goal is to find faults, not f...
Introduction When an organization gets "no non-conformity" in an audit, it's often seen as a sign of a perfect system. But is that really true? The answer is simple: No, having zero non-conformities does not always mean the organization has a good system. Let's look at the real reasons behind this. Reasons for "No Non-Conformity Hiding Information from the Auditor The most common reason for getting no non-conformity is that information gets hidden from the auditor. This doesn't happen by accident — it's usually because of some kind of pressure. - Management pressure: Many times, the auditee faces strong pressure from management to not have any non-conformities in the report. - Department targets: Sometimes departments get specific targets like "no non-conformities during the audit," which can encourage hiding real issues. Auditing Issues It's not just about what's happening inside the organization. Sometimes the fault is with the audit i...