Fact-Finding Audits vs. Fault-Finding Audits: Which Approach is Right?
In quality management and audit practices, methodology isn’t just procedural—it’s foundational to credibility. Today, I want to clarify an important distinction that often gets overlooked: the difference between fact-finding and fault-finding audits. What is a Fact-Finding Audit? A fact-finding audit is an objective, predetermined approach to quality auditing. Here’s how it works in practice: The auditor decides in advance what they will check. For example, they might say, “I will audit the production area today and examine 3 production samples.” This sample size is predetermined, justified, and planned. During the audit, they check those 3 samples against established criteria. Then, critically, they report what they found—honestly. If there are zero non-conformities, they report zero. If there are non-conformities, they report those. The audit reflects reality. What is a Fault-Finding Audit? A fault-finding audit has a different mindset. The implicit goal is to find faults, not f...